基于自建街市及其邻域功能动态特征的协同规划方法研究

China's rapid urbanization led to the increasingly tense relationship between people-space, collapse of local everyday life, which led to traditional street market facing the "survival" crisis，also gave its bottom-up birth again after city top- down planning，which caused social conflicts, the loss of urban vitality and diversity, and also challenging the planning management of public space. .This research explores how to form coordinated development in planning and self-building in the urban built environment，based on case study of whole Self-built street market in downtown Changsha since 1978 . From the analysis point of view of "spatial texture + everyday life + related industrial chain", mining dynamic features, build a multi-dimensional space-based network platform to promote two-way interaction. Observe and record the process of planning and self-build, to won collaborative development methods..The research preset that planning and self-construction are not binary oppositions.The mutual cooperation in reality may be the result of the process of co-evolution. The research has solved the barriers between planning and self-build for a long time, provide a theoretical basis for more diverse public participation,and provide a potential leverage point for better and more democratic urban public life.

我国快速城市化发展加剧了日益紧张的人地关系矛盾与地域性日常生活的瓦解，从而导致传统街市一方面面临“生存”危机，另一方面也孕育其在经历自上而下规划后再次自下而上的“生长”。由此引发了一定的社会冲突，也导致了城市活力和多样性丧失，并对城市现行刚性空间规划和管理提出了挑战。. 此次研究探索城市建成环境中规划和自建如何形成协同发展的问题，选取1978年以来长沙市中心城区极具活力的自建街市为案例样本。从“空间肌理+日常生活+关联产业链”的分析视点，挖掘功能动态特征，建构基于多维空间的网络平台来促成双向互动。观察记录规划与自建发展的过程，获取协同发展方法。. 研究预设规划和自建并非二元对立的关系，现实中的相互协同可能是共同进化过程的结果。研究解决了长期以来规划与自建之间的壁垒问题，为更多元化的公众参与提供理论基础，为配置更好，更民主的城市公共生活提供了一个潜在的杠杆点

我国快速城市化发展加剧了日益紧张的人地关系矛盾与地域性日常生活的瓦解，从而导致传统街市一方面面临“生存”危机，另一方面也孕育其在经历自上而下规划后再次自下而上的“生长”。由此引发了一定的社会冲突，也导致了城市活力和多样性丧失，并对城市现行刚性空间规划和管理提出了挑战。.此次研究探索城市建成环境中规划和自建如何形成协同发展的问题，选取1978年以来长沙市中心城区极具活力的自建街市为案例样本。从“空间肌理+日常生活+关联产业链”的分析视点，挖掘功能动态特征，建构基于多维空间的网络平台来促成双向互动。观察规划与自建发展的过程，获取协同发展方法。.研究预设规划和自建并非二元对立的关系，现实中的相互协同可能是共同进化过程的结果。研究解决了长期以来规划与自建之间的壁垒问题，为更多元化的公众参与提供理论基础，为配置更好，更民主的城市公共生活提供了一个潜在的杠杆点。